This installment of our series on 6 common causes of E&O claims ›› discusses claims for failure to give accurate information/advice. If you do not effectively communicate about what you are selling, a client may believe they weren’t provided with adequate information to make an informed coverage decision.
WHAT CAN YOU DO TO AVOID THESE CLAIMS?
Know what you’re selling
Market Effectively
Limit Considerations
Present Terms and Conditions of Coverage
COULD THIS HAPPEN TO YOU?
An agency wrote a CGL and a Commercial Auto for a client. The CGL had a $1,000,000 limit, and the Commercial Auto had a $300,000 limit. One of the client’s vehicles struck and killed a motorcyclist, who died 30 days after the loss. The value of the underlying death claim was in the $1,500,000 to $2,500,000 range.
After the client was sued by the Estate, the client alleged the agent told him that the CGL would respond in excess of the $300,000 auto limit, and further alleged the agency should have recommended higher auto limits. The agency denied ever telling the client that the CGL would be excess for an auto loss, and further stated the client had been informed numerous times in the past to the increase the auto limits. Unfortunately, there was no paper back up of those discussions and due to the long-term relationship with this client, the claim against the agent settled for $500,000.
LESSON: Always document in writing any limit discussions you have with your clients.
The agent wrote property coverage for their client who was in the business of refurbishing railroad cars. A hurricane destroyed one of the client’s locations, and a claim for Business Interruption was made with carrier. The policy was placed through an MGA and had a 90% co-insurance clause for Business Interruption.
The agent was confused about how to calculate the proper limit of coverage for Business Interruption and assumed the proper limit for Business Interruption was merely profits. In actuality, the proper method to calculate limits for that coverage is profits plus continuing expenses. Following the loss, it was determined the agency’s client was drastically underinsured, resulting in an 82% coinsurance penalty. The loss to the client due the coinsurance penalty was around $160,000 and the case was settled for $135,000.
LESSON: When in doubt concerning how to calculate the proper amount of coverage, don’t guess – consult various resources, including the carrier.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, REVIEW THE PREVIOUS ARTICLES IN THE SERIES:
Part I: 6 Common Causes of Agents’ E&O Claims ››
Part II: Failure to Obtain/Maintain Proper Coverage ››
5R-1420
This information is provided solely as an insurance risk management tool. Utica Mutual Insurance Company and the other member insurance companies of the Utica National Insurance Group (“Utica National”) are not providing legal advice or any other professional services. Utica National shall have no liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damages alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the use of the information provided. You are encouraged to consult an attorney or other professional for advice on these issues.